Add BSP2 support to the remaining utils. Since these share the common
bspfile.[ch] files, it was more effort than is justifiable to break this
into multiple staged patches - so you just get this disgustingly big
commit instead. Here is basically what was done:
* Modify the bspdata_t struct with a union of the two bsp formats
* Modify the tools to use bsp2_t for all internal processing
* Split out the byte swapping routines for the different bsp data types
* Add simple (although verbose) code to convert bsp29 <-> bsp2
Hundreds of lines added to bspfile.c, but mostly trivial stuff. The tools
internally had little modification except to substitute the bsp2 type
names.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Transition all tools to access the BSP data via the bspdata struct instead
of the shared globals. Remove the compatibility code from bspfile which
copied the global values to/from the instanced bspdata struct.
Mostly the changes just involved passing along the bspdata struct to the
various functions which needed to reference the data. TraceLine and
MakeTNodes in light got some extra changes so that we cache the node
dplane pointer and remove the need to pass the bspdata struct to every
trace operation!
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Removes the MAX_MAP_ENTITIES and MAX_MAP_ENTSTRING limitations by
counting how much space we will need before parsing/writing.
Now that I look at it, I'm not sure why we should even be re-writing
the entity string in the new bsp file, but I'll leave that behaviour
alone... for now.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Precalculate the distance at which lights will fade to zero brightness.
For lights with inverse falloff, use the gate value to determine the
cut-off distance. Use this value to cull samples and avoid the ray
tracing overhead.
Hopefully not too controversially, I am going to default this to "on" with
a gate value of 0.001. Unless you have > 1000 lights contributing
fractional light values across your map, this is not going to make any
visible difference.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
We were calculating these values for every light and for every surface,
which seems a little excessive... Also made the variable names a bit more
sensible - we had stored a direction vector, not the actual mangle values.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Implement the two extra light attenuation formulae that were added to
Benjt Jardrup's light util (http://user.tninet.se/~xir870k/readmevis.txt).
Signed-off-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@disenchant.net>
Eric Wasylishen
Kevin Shanahan
Tyrann